State of Washington

Ethics Advisory Committee

Opinion 91-19

Question

Is it proper for a judicial officer to accept a complimentary membership in a social club by the waiver of the initiation fee or monthly fee, when the membership is given because of the judicial position held?

Answer

Judicial membership in private clubs in not prohibited by the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Whether a judge should accept a gift is an ethical dilemma requiring an analysis of Canon 5C(4)(c) and Canon 2B. Even though the gift offered and accepted complies with Canon 5C, the provisions of Canon 2B must also be met.

There is no restriction on a judge accepting a gift, even a very expensive gift so long as the provisions of Canon 5C(4)(c) are not violated and the reporting requirements of Canon 6C are also met. The acceptance of gifts however, must also comply with Canon 2B. Acceptance of complimentary memberships offered judges because of the position they hold creates the perception that it lends the prestige of the judicial office to the donor. These gifts of membership may convey the impression or permit others to convey the impression that the club and its members are in a special position to influence the judge and thereby violates Canon 2B.

If judges have accepted complimentary memberships they may elect to remain members but should make arrangements to pay for their memberships.

NOTE: Effective June 23, 1995, the Supreme Court amended the Code of Judicial Conduct. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

Opinion 91-19—CJC Canon 5(C)(4)(c) became 5(C)(5)(c).

The Supreme Court adopted a new Code of Judicial Conduct effective January 1, 2011. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

CJC 1.3
CJC 3.6
CJC 3.13

Opinion 91-19

06/24/1991

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S5